Imagine an engineer spending weeks designing a rigid-flex PCB for a foldable phone—only to find the signal traces in the flexible area crack after 1,000 folds. Or a car electronics team reworking a PCB because routing caused crosstalk between the rigid power layer and flexible signal layer. Routing (the process of placing copper traces) is the make-or-break step in rigid-flex PCB design: it’s where the "flexible" and "rigid" parts collide, and even small mistakes ruin reliability.
Unlike traditional PCBs (fixed routing) or FPCs (all-flexible routing), rigid-flex PCBs demand routing that works for both rigid and flexible zones. The goal is to keep signals stable when the PCB bends, avoid stress on traces, and prevent interference between layers. Below are the 4 biggest routing challenges—and proven strategies to fix them, using examples from Samsung, Tesla, and medical device makers.
The #1 routing failure in rigid-flex PCBs: traces in the flexible area crack or break after repeated bending. Why? Engineers often route traces the same way they do in rigid PCBs—straight lines, sharp corners, or too-thin widths—all of which concentrate stress when the PCB bends.
A test by the IPC (Association Connecting Electronics Industries) found that straight traces in flexible zones fail after 5,000-10,000 folds, while foldable devices need 200,000+ folds.
- Use Curved or "S-Shaped" Traces: Curves absorb bending stress (like a spring) instead of concentrating it. Samsung’s foldable phone PCBs use S-shaped traces in flexible zones—failure rates dropped from 25% to 3%.
- Avoid Sharp Corners: Replace 90° corners with 45° angles or rounded bends. A wearable tech firm found 90° corners caused 40% of flexible trace cracks; switching to rounded bends cut this to 8%.
- Widen Trace Width: Flexible zone traces should be 0.2mm+ (vs. 0.1mm in rigid zones). Thicker traces resist cracking—Tesla’s automotive rigid-flex PCBs use 0.25mm flexible traces; they survive 300,000+ vibration-induced bends.
Rigid-flex PCBs have mixed layers: rigid layers (for power, heavy components) and flexible layers (for signals). If traces are routed too close between these layers, signals in flexible zones get disrupted by noise from rigid power layers—a problem called "inter-layer crosstalk."
A medical device maker reported that 30% of its glucose monitor errors came from this: flexible signal traces (for sensor data) were routed too near rigid power traces, causing data distortion.
- Route Signals & Power on Separate Layers: Keep flexible signal layers at least one layer away from rigid power layers. For example, place a ground layer between the rigid power layer and flexible signal layer—this acts as a "shield." A drone maker used this setup; inter-layer crosstalk dropped by 50%.
- Add Dedicated Ground Traces for Flexible Signals: Run a ground trace parallel to each critical signal trace in flexible zones (e.g., sensor data traces). This reduces noise pickup—Medtronic’s medical rigid-flex PCBs use this; signal distortion fell to 1% from 15%.
- Avoid Crossing Power Traces Over Signal Traces: If layers overlap, route power traces perpendicular (not parallel) to signal traces. Parallel routing increases crosstalk by 3x—an automotive team fixed this by reorienting traces, cutting interference by 65%.
The "flex-rigid boundary" (where the rigid layer meets the flexible layer) is a stress hotspot. If components (e.g., resistors, connectors) are routed too close to this boundary, bending the PCB pulls on the traces—causing them to separate from the substrate.
A consumer electronics lab found that traces within 1mm of the flex-rigid boundary fail 2x more often than those 3mm away.
- Create a 2-3mm "Buffer Zone": Keep all traces and components at least 2mm away from the flex-rigid boundary. Samsung’s Z Fold5 PCBs use a 3mm buffer; trace separation failures dropped by 70%.
- Route Traces Perpendicular to the Boundary: Traces crossing the boundary should run straight (perpendicular) to it—not at an angle. Angled traces stretch more during bending—Tesla’s battery PCBs switched to perpendicular routing; stress-induced failures fell by 45%.
- Avoid Heavy Components Near the Boundary: Place heavy components (e.g., 5g+ chips) on rigid layers, at least 5mm from the boundary. A smartwatch maker moved a 10g processor 5mm from the boundary; trace damage from component weight dropped to 0%.
In high-speed applications (e.g., 5G, radar), signal traces must be the same length to reach their destination at the same time. But in flexible zones, routing often creates uneven lengths (e.g., one trace bends more than another), causing "skew" (signal delay) and data errors.
Qualcomm found that a 0.5mm length difference in 5G signal traces caused 10% data loss in rigid-flex PCBs.
- Match Trace Lengths to Within 0.1mm: Use design software (Altium, Cadence) to measure and adjust flexible trace lengths. A 5G module maker matched traces to 0.05mm; signal skew dropped to 20ps (picoseconds) from 100ps.
- Use "Snake Routing" for Short Traces: If one trace is shorter, add small "snake-like" loops to extend it (keep loops in non-bending areas to avoid stress). Huawei’s 5G rigid-flex PCBs use this; length differences were cut from 0.8mm to 0.08mm.
- Avoid Routing Long Traces Through Multiple Bends: Each bend adds tiny length variations. Route long signals through a single flexible zone—Boeing’s aerospace PCBs do this; trace length variation fell by 60%.
Rigid-flex PCB routing isn’t just about placing traces—it’s about understanding how the PCB will move and perform in real use. The biggest mistakes happen when engineers treat rigid-flex routing like traditional PCB routing: ignoring bending stress, layer interference, boundary stress, or length matching.
By using stress-relief curves in flexible zones, separating signal/power layers, adding boundary buffers, and matching trace lengths, you can turn routing challenges into reliable designs. Samsung’s foldable phones, Tesla’s cars, and Medtronic’s medical devices all prove this: with the right strategies, rigid-flex PCBs deliver the best of both worlds—flexibility where you need it, stability where you don’t.
The next time you design a rigid-flex PCB, remember: every trace you place should answer one question: Will this work when the PCB bends? If the answer is "no," rethink the route.
Founded in 2009, our company has deep roots in the production of various circuit boards. We are dedicated to laying a solid electronic foundation and providing key support for the development of diverse industries.
Whether you are engaged in electronic manufacturing, smart device R&D, or any other field with circuit board needs, feel free to reach out to us via email at sales06@kbefpc.com. We look forward to addressing your inquiries, customizing solutions, and sincerely invite partners from all sectors to consult and collaborate, exploring new possibilities in the industry together.
English
Wechat
+86 13670210335
+86 13670210335
E-mail