Two years ago, I was a procurement manager at a startup building smart home sensors. We needed a rigid-flex PCB to fit our device’s tiny, curved case—but when suppliers quoted us $18 per board, our team panicked. “That’s double what we budgeted,” our CEO said. “Can we switch back to separate rigid PCBs?”
I spent the next month digging into rigid-flex costs, talking to 12 manufacturers, and testing small changes to our design. By the end, we got the price down to $11 per board—without cutting quality. That experience taught me a key lesson: rigid-flex PCBs are often labeled “expensive,” but most of their cost comes from avoidable choices in substrates, processes, and testing.
In this article, I’ll break down where rigid-flex costs really come from (using real numbers from suppliers), share the cost-saving tricks that worked for my team, and explain how to find hidden savings without ruining your board’s performance.
Substrates (the materials that make up the rigid and flexible layers) are the single largest cost driver for rigid-flex PCBs—usually 40 to 50% of the total price. Most teams overspend here by choosing “premium” materials they don’t need. Let’s break down the options and savings:
The rigid parts of a rigid-flex PCB are typically made of FR4, a glass-reinforced epoxy. Suppliers often push “high-TG FR4” (TG = glass transition temperature, the point where the material softens) for “better performance.” But high-TG FR4 costs 15–20% more than standard TG FR4 (TG ~130°C vs. high-TG ~170°C).
“Do you really need your rigid-flex PCB to handle 170°C?” asked Raj, a technical sales rep at a PCB manufacturer in Taiwan. “Most consumer electronics (like smart sensors or wearables) never get above 80°C. Using standard TG FR4 cuts substrate costs immediately.”
For our smart home sensor, we switched from high-TG FR4 to standard TG. That alone saved us $1.20 per board—15% of our original substrate cost.
The flexible layers use polyimide (PI) film. The two biggest mistakes here are:
-
Choosing PI thicker than needed (e.g., 0.125mm when 0.075mm works).
-
Paying for “name-brand” PI (like DuPont) when generic PI meets specs.
Thicker PI costs more: 0.125mm PI is 25% pricier than 0.075mm PI. And name-brand PI? It’s 30–40% more expensive than generic PI—even though most generic PI has the same flexibility and heat resistance for consumer or industrial use.
“We tested three PI films: DuPont (name-brand), a Taiwanese generic, and a Chinese generic,” said Maria, an engineer at a medical device firm. “All worked for our device (which bends 100x per day). Switching to the Chinese generic saved us $0.80 per board.”
For our sensor, we went with 0.075mm generic PI instead of 0.125mm DuPont PI. That added another $0.90 in savings per board.
Adhesives bond the rigid and flexible layers together. “No-flow” adhesives (which don’t melt during reflow soldering) are popular, but they cost 30% more than standard “flow” adhesives. The catch? No-flow adhesives are only necessary if your PCB has components very close to the rigid-flex transition.
“We thought we needed no-flow adhesive for our sensor,” I said. “But Raj pointed out our components were 5mm away from the transition—standard flow adhesive would work. That saved us $0.50 per board.”
The manufacturing processes (like drilling, plating, and lamination) make up 30–35% of rigid-flex costs. Here, the biggest savings come from simplifying designs and avoiding unnecessary steps.
Every hole in a rigid-flex PCB (for vias or connectors) requires a drill bit—and drill bits wear out. More holes mean more time, more bits, and higher costs. Suppliers charge $0.05–$0.10 per hole, depending on size.
Our original sensor design had 18 holes. We worked with our engineer to remove 6 non-critical holes (e.g., we combined two small vias into one). That saved us $0.45 per board (6 holes x $0.075/hole).
“Customers often add extra holes ‘just in case,’” Raj said. “Ask: ‘Does this hole serve a real function?’ If not, cut it.”
Most rigid-flex PCBs use gold plating on connectors for better conductivity. But gold is expensive—$0.02–$0.03 per square centimeter. For non-critical connectors (e.g., internal connections, not external ports), nickel-palladium (NiPd) plating works just as well and costs 40% less.
Our sensor had a small internal connector plated with gold. We switched to NiPd, saving $0.60 per board. “NiPd doesn’t look as shiny as gold, but it conducts just as well for internal use,” Maria said. “We haven’t had a single connectivity issue.”
Rigid-flex PCBs are made by laminating (pressing together) multiple layers of FR4 and PI. Each extra layer adds cost—usually $1.50–$2.00 per layer. Most teams overdesign with more layers than needed.
Our original design had 6 layers. We realized we could combine two signal layers into one (since our sensor didn’t need separate layers for low-speed signals). Going to 5 layers saved us $1.80 per board.
“Ask your engineer: ‘Can we reduce the number of layers without losing performance?’” Raj advised. “I’ve seen teams cut 2 layers and still meet all specs.”
Testing ensures your rigid-flex PCBs work, but over-testing is a huge waste. Most teams pay for expensive tests they don’t need. Let’s break down the key tests and savings:
Two common electrical tests:
-
AOI (Automated Optical Inspection): Uses cameras to check for defects (like missing traces). Costs $0.30–$0.50 per board.
-
Flying Probe Testing: Uses small “probes” to test every connection. Costs $1.50–$2.00 per board—great for high-volume runs, but overkill for low-volume (under 1,000 units).
We were originally paying for flying probe testing for our 500-unit sensor runs. Switching to AOI saved us $1.20 per board. “AOI caught all the defects we had (like a few missing solder masks),” I said. “Flying probe was unnecessary for our small batch size.”
Flex testing (bending the PCB to ensure it doesn’t break) is important—but testing beyond your device’s actual use is wasteful. For example, if your device bends 100x in its lifetime, testing to 10,000 bends is unnecessary.
Suppliers charge $0.50–$1.00 per board for flex testing, depending on the number of bends. We originally tested to 5,000 bends, but our sensor only needs 500 bends. Reducing the test to 500 bends cut our testing cost by $0.30 per board.
“Test to your device’s real-world use, not the supplier’s ‘standard’,” Maria said. “Standard tests are often overkill.”
Some tests (like visual inspections for cracks) can be done in-house instead of paying the supplier. We started checking for PI tears or FR4 cracks ourselves, saving $0.20 per board (the supplier’s fee for visual inspection).
“Just train one team member to do basic checks,” I said. “It takes 2 minutes per board and avoids paying the supplier’s markup.”
Let’s put this all together with our smart home sensor. Our original quote was $18 per board. Here’s how we saved $7 per board (39% total):
The best part? We didn’t sacrifice quality. Our sensors passed all performance tests, and we’ve had zero returns due to rigid-flex issues in two years.
The biggest mistake teams make with rigid-flex PCBs is accepting the first quote or choosing “premium” options without asking: “Do we need this?” Most cost savings come from small, intentional choices—using standard TG FR4 instead of high-TG, cutting unnecessary holes, or switching to AOI testing.
For my team, the key was partnering with our supplier (Raj’s company) to audit every cost line. Suppliers know where the waste is—they just need you to ask. And remember: cost savings don’t mean “cheapening out.” They mean spending money only on what your device actually needs.
Next time you get a rigid-flex quote, grab a calculator and go line by line. You’ll be surprised how much you can save—without breaking your board.
Founded in 2009, our company has deep roots in the production of various circuit boards. We are dedicated to laying a solid electronic foundation and providing key support for the development of diverse industries.
Whether you are engaged in electronic manufacturing, smart device R&D, or any other field with circuit board needs, feel free to reach out to us via email at sales06@kbefpc.com. We look forward to addressing your inquiries, customizing solutions, and sincerely invite partners from all sectors to consult and collaborate, exploring new possibilities in the industry together.
English
Wechat
+86 13670210335
+86 13670210335
E-mail