News

Rigid-Flex PCBs vs. FPCs: How to Choose for Electronic Products?

Date: 2025-08-20

1. Introduction: The "Flexibility Dilemma" in Design

Imagine you’re an engineer designing a foldable phone: you need a circuit that bends 200,000 times without breaking, but also supports high-speed data for the screen. Or you’re building a smartwatch: space is so tight, every millimeter counts, but the circuit must handle constant wrist movement. These are the moments when you face a critical choice: Rigid-Flex PCB or FPC (Flexible Printed Circuit)?

Both technologies enable flexibility, but they’re not interchangeable. Pick the wrong one, and you’ll end up with a product that fails (e.g., a smartwatch that dies after a month) or costs 30% more than needed. Let’s break down how to choose, using real-world examples.

2. First, Understand the Core Differences

Before choosing, you need to know what sets them apart:

  • FPC: A thin, fully flexible circuit made of polyimide or polyester. Think of it as a "flexible ribbon"—it bends easily but needs extra support (like a plastic frame) to hold components (e.g., chips, sensors). For example, Apple’s AirPods use FPCs to connect the battery to the speaker—they’re lightweight and cheap to produce.
  • Rigid-Flex PCB: Combines rigid layers (like traditional PCBs) and flexible layers into one unit. It’s like a "hybrid"—the rigid parts hold heavy components (e.g., processors), while the flexible parts bend. Samsung’s foldable phones use rigid-flex PCBs: the rigid section houses the chip, and the flexible section bends with the screen.

The key gap? Component integration. FPCs need external support to mount parts, while rigid-flex PCBs can integrate everything in one piece.

3. Choose Based on 3 Critical Factors

Factor 1: Space & Weight Constraints

If your product is ultra-compact (e.g., smart earbuds, tiny medical sensors), FPCs are better. They’re as thin as 0.05mm (thinner than a human hair) and weigh 50% less than rigid-flex PCBs. For example, Fitbit’s smallest fitness tracker uses FPCs—any rigid-flex PCB would be too bulky to fit on a wrist.

But if your product needs to hold multiple heavy components (e.g., a drone’s flight controller), rigid-flex PCBs win. They eliminate the need for wires or connectors to link separate rigid PCBs, saving up to 40% of internal space. DJI’s latest drones use rigid-flex PCBs to combine the GPS module, battery connector, and motor controls in one compact unit.

Factor 2: Durability & Usage Scenarios

For products that bend constantly (e.g., foldable phones, flip cameras), rigid-flex PCBs are more durable. Their hybrid design handles repeated bending (up to 200,000 cycles) better than FPCs, which can crack if bent too often. Samsung tested both: FPCs in early foldable prototypes failed after 50,000 folds, while rigid-flex PCBs lasted 200,000+.

For products that bend occasionally (e.g., a laptop’s hinge area), FPCs work fine. They’re cheaper and simpler, and occasional bending won’t damage them. Lenovo uses FPCs in its laptop hinges—they’ve proven reliable for 5+ years of regular use.
34.jpg

Factor 3: Cost & Production Scale

If you’re making a high-volume, low-cost product (e.g., budget wireless earbuds), FPCs are cheaper. Their production process is simpler, and they cost 20-30% less than rigid-flex PCBs. Xiaomi’s entry-level earbuds use FPCs to keep prices under $30.

If you’re making a low-volume, high-performance product (e.g., medical monitors, aerospace devices), rigid-flex PCBs are worth the cost. They reduce assembly steps (no need to connect separate PCBs) and lower failure rates by 50%. Medtronic uses rigid-flex PCBs in its heart monitors—reliability is more important than cost here.

4. Avoid These Common Mistakes

  • Mistake 1: Choosing FPCs for heavy component mounting. A startup once used FPCs to hold a drone’s processor (a heavy chip)—the FPC bent under the weight, causing the drone to crash. Rigid-flex PCBs would have fixed this.
  • Mistake 2: Overspending on rigid-flex PCBs for simple products. A brand used rigid-flex PCBs in basic smartwatches—they worked, but the extra cost made the product too expensive to compete. FPCs would have been sufficient.

5. Conclusion: It’s All About "Fit"

Rigid-flex PCBs and FPCs aren’t "better" or "worse"—they’re designed for different jobs. FPCs shine in small, low-cost, occasionally bent products. Rigid-flex PCBs excel in high-performance, frequently bent products that need to hold heavy components.

The best choice? Ask yourself: How much space do I have? How often will it bend? What’s more important—cost or durability? By answering these, you’ll pick the technology that makes your product reliable, affordable, and ready for real-world use.

Founded in 2009, our company has deep roots in the production of various circuit boards. We are dedicated to laying a solid electronic foundation and providing key support for the development of diverse industries.   Whether you are engaged in electronic manufacturing, smart device R&D, or any other field with circuit board needs, feel free to reach out to us via email at sales06@kbefpc.com. We look forward to addressing your inquiries, customizing solutions, and sincerely invite partners from all sectors to consult and collaborate, exploring new possibilities in the industry together.

Capel manufacturing PCBs since 2009. Professional technology and high-precision Printed Circuit Boards involved in Medical, IOT, UAV, Aviation, Automotive, Aerospace, Industrial Control, Artificial Intelligence, Consumer Electronics etc..

Facebook Twitter Linkedin YouTube Instagram

CONTACT US

    Shenzhen Capel Technology Co., Ltd. +86 13670210335 sales06@kbefpc.com +86 13670210335 +86 13670210335

Leave Your Message