Introduction: The Factory Pump That Failed—Thanks to Hidden Chemical Corrosion
Last fall, David, a maintenance engineer at a petrochemical plant in Texas, spent three days tracking down why a critical pump’s control system kept shutting down. The pump was exposed to daily splashes of oil, cleaning solvents, and humid, chemical-laden air—and when he finally opened the control box, he found the culprit: a corroded FPC (Flexible Printed Circuit) board.
“The copper traces were green with oxidation, and the polyimide film was peeling off,” he said, holding up the damaged FPC. “We’d replaced it two months earlier, but the chemicals in the air had eaten through it. That pump outage cost the plant $15,000 a day in downtime.”
David’s problem is a nightmare for engineers in harsh industrial settings—think petrochemical plants, food processing facilities (with caustic cleaners), or automotive factories (with oil and coolants). FPCs are perfect for these environments because they bend around moving parts, but their default design isn’t built to resist chemicals. Left unprotected, they’ll corrode, short-circuit, and fail—fast.
In this article, we’ll break down how chemicals destroy FPCs in industrial settings, share stories from engineers who’ve fixed these issues, and outline proven ways to boost FPC chemical resistance—so your boards last months (or years) instead of weeks.
To fix FPC corrosion, you first need to understand how chemicals attack them. FPCs are made of three key parts: a polyimide (PI) film base, thin copper traces, and a solder mask (a protective layer over the traces). Industrial chemicals target all three—often in ways you can’t see until it’s too late.
Copper is the lifeblood of FPCs—it carries electricity through the traces. But when copper comes into contact with moisture and chemicals (like acids, alkalis, or even salt in humid air), it oxidizes. This creates a green, flaky layer called “verdigris” (copper carbonate), which blocks electrical flow.
In David’s petrochemical plant, the culprit was a mix of oil vapors and humid air. “The oil trapped moisture against the copper traces,” he explained. “In two months, the traces were so corroded, they couldn’t carry current. The pump’s sensors stopped sending data, so the system shut down.”
Worse, some chemicals (like the caustic cleaners used in food factories) speed up this process. Maria, an engineer at a dairy processing plant in Wisconsin, saw this firsthand: “We used a sodium hydroxide cleaner to sanitize equipment. It got on the FPCs in the milk pumps, and the copper traces corroded in three weeks.”
The PI film is the FPC’s flexible backbone—it holds the copper traces in place. But strong solvents (like the degreasers used in automotive factories) or high-temperature chemicals can break down the PI’s molecular structure. Over time, the film becomes brittle, cracks, or peels away—exposing the copper traces underneath.
Raj, a process engineer at an Indian auto parts factory, dealt with this: “We use a solvent to clean engine parts, and it would seep into the FPC enclosures. The PI film on our motor control FPCs started peeling after a month. Once the film was gone, the copper traces got covered in oil and corroded.”
Most FPCs have a thin solder mask (usually a liquid photoimageable coating) over the copper traces to protect them. But industrial chemicals can dissolve or weaken this mask. For example, the acidic coolants used in metalworking shops can eat through the mask, leaving the copper exposed to corrosion.
“We had FPCs in our CNC machine controls failing every six weeks,” said Lisa, an engineer at a German manufacturing firm. “We tested the coolant, and it turned out the acidity was breaking down the solder mask. Once the mask was gone, the copper traces corroded instantly.”
Over the past decade, engineers and manufacturers have developed specific solutions to protect FPCs from industrial chemicals. These aren’t “experimental” fixes—they’re tested, validated, and used in factories worldwide.
The simplest and most effective way to protect FPCs is to apply a chemical-resistant coating over the entire board. These coatings are thin (50–100 microns), flexible (so they don’t crack when the FPC bends), and designed to repel oils, solvents, acids, and alkalis.
The two most common coatings for industrial FPCs are:
-
PTFE (Polytetrafluoroethylene) Coatings: Also known as Teflon, PTFE is resistant to almost all industrial chemicals (including solvents and acids) and can handle high temperatures (up to 260°C). David’s petrochemical plant switched to PTFE-coated FPCs: “We’ve had the same boards for eight months now—no corrosion, no failures.”
-
Polyurethane Coatings: More affordable than PTFE, polyurethane resists oils, greases, and mild solvents (perfect for food processing or automotive factories). Maria’s dairy plant used polyurethane-coated FPCs: “The sodium hydroxide cleaner doesn’t touch the film or copper. We replaced the boards once a year instead of once a month.”
Key tip: Make sure the coating covers all exposed parts of the FPC—including the edges and connector areas. “We missed the connector edges on our first try,” Raj said. “Chemicals seeped in there and corroded the traces. Now we coat the entire board, connectors included.”
Even the best coating can’t protect FPCs from direct, heavy chemical splashes (like a bucket of solvent spilling on the board). For these high-risk areas, use a sealed enclosure to keep chemicals out.
Enclosures for industrial FPCs should be:
-
Made of Chemical-Resistant Materials: Choose plastic (like polypropylene or PVC) or stainless steel—both resist oils, acids, and solvents.
-
IP-Rated for Dust and Moisture: Look for IP67 or IP68 ratings—these mean the enclosure is dust-tight and can withstand temporary submersion (critical for wet environments like washdown areas in food plants).
Lisa’s German CNC factory used IP68 polypropylene enclosures for their FPCs: “The coolant never touches the boards now. We used to replace FPCs every six weeks; now they last two years.”
For extreme environments (like offshore oil rigs, where saltwater and harsh chemicals are everywhere), go a step further: use FPCs made with corrosion-resistant materials from the start.
Two key material upgrades:
-
Nickel-Plated Copper Traces: Nickel is more corrosion-resistant than pure copper. Plating the copper traces with a thin layer of nickel (5–10 microns) adds a barrier against oxidation. “We use nickel-plated FPCs on our offshore platforms,” said James, an engineer at a British oil company. “Saltwater doesn’t corrode the traces—they stay clean for years.”
-
High-Performance PI Film: Not all PI films are the same. Look for “chemical-resistant PI” (often mixed with other polymers like polyethersulfone) that can withstand strong solvents and high temperatures. “The standard PI film peeled in our solvent-heavy environment,” Raj said. “Switching to chemical-resistant PI stopped that—no more peeling, even after months of exposure.”
Let’s put this all together with a real-world example. A large bakery in Illinois was struggling with FPC failures in their dough mixer control systems. The mixers were cleaned daily with a caustic sodium hydroxide solution, and the FPCs were failing every 4–6 weeks—costing the bakery $8,000 a week in downtime. Here’s how they fixed it:
-
Chemical Exposure: Sodium hydroxide cleaner splashed on the FPCs, breaking down the PI film and corroding the copper traces.
-
Wet Environment: The washdown process left the FPCs wet, speeding up oxidation.
-
No Protection: The FPCs had no coating and were in a basic plastic enclosure (not sealed).
-
Coated FPCs: They switched to FPCs with polyurethane coatings (covering the entire board, including connectors).
-
Sealed Enclosures: They installed IP67 polypropylene enclosures around the FPCs to block direct splashes.
-
Corrosion-Resistant Traces: They upgraded to nickel-plated copper traces for extra protection against the caustic cleaner.
-
FPC failure rate dropped from once every 4–6 weeks to once every 18 months.
-
Downtime costs went from $8,000 a week to $8,000 a year.
-
The bakery saved over $350,000 in replacement parts and downtime in the first year.
“The difference was night and day,” said Tom, the bakery’s maintenance manager. “We used to have a technician fixing mixers every month. Now, we forget about the FPCs—they just work.”
David, Maria, and Tom all learned the hard way: in harsh industrial environments, unprotected FPCs will fail. But with the right combination of coatings, enclosures, and corrosion-resistant materials, you can turn a “replace every month” FPC into one that lasts years.
The key isn’t to “overengineer” every FPC—instead, match the protection to the environment:
-
For mild chemical exposure (e.g., small oil vapors), a simple polyurethane coating works.
-
For heavy splashes (e.g., food plant washdowns), add a sealed IP67 enclosure.
-
For extreme environments (e.g., offshore oil rigs), use nickel-plated traces and chemical-resistant PI.
As factories become more automated, FPCs will be used in more harsh spots—from high-temperature ovens to chemical-filled tanks. The engineers who succeed will be the ones who don’t just “install” FPCs—they “protect” them.
Next time you’re specifying an FPC for an industrial environment, ask yourself: “What chemicals will this board face?” Then pick the right protection. Your factory (and your budget) will thank you.