Last year, my team ran an FPC production line for a consumer electronics client. We were focused on meeting deadlines—until the local environmental agency showed up with a surprise inspection. They tested our wastewater and found high levels of sodium hydroxide (used in FPC etching) and isopropyl alcohol (IPA, used for cleaning). We got a $12,000 fine and were told to cut chemical use by 30% within 3 months. “We can’t keep pouring money into fines or toxic chemicals,” our plant manager, Elena, said. “We need to rethink how we make FPCs.”
We thought eco-friendly processes would be expensive or slow—but we were wrong. Over the next 12 weeks, we replaced harsh chemicals with safer alternatives, optimized our cleaning steps, and even reused some reagents. By the end, we’d cut chemical use by 35%—and saved $8,000 a month on chemical purchases and waste disposal. That experience taught us: FPC manufacturing doesn’t have to rely on toxic chemicals. Small, smart changes can make the process greener, cheaper, and better for the planet.
FPCs are made with multiple chemical-heavy steps—most teams use these chemicals out of habit, not necessity. Here are the three biggest culprits we found, and their hidden costs:
Etching removes unwanted copper from PI film to create traces. Traditional processes use sodium hydroxide (a corrosive base) or ferric chloride (a toxic salt). Both are hard to dispose of—they require special treatment to avoid polluting water.
“In our old process, we used 500 liters of sodium hydroxide a week,” said our production lead, Marco. “Treating that waste cost $2,000 a month. And if even a small amount spilled, we had to shut down the line for hours to clean it.”
FPCs need cleaning after etching, soldering, and lamination. Most teams use IPA or acetone—volatile chemicals that evaporate into the air (causing air pollution) and require ventilation systems to protect workers.
“We went through 300 liters of IPA a week,” Elena said. “The fumes were so strong, workers had to wear respirators. And we had to replace the ventilation filters every month—another $500 expense.”
Plating copper or gold on FPC traces often uses cyanide (highly toxic) or sulfuric acid (corrosive). These chemicals are not only dangerous—they also require strict storage (locked cabinets, spill kits) that adds to costs.
“We used a cyanide-based gold plating solution,” Marco said. “We had to train 3 workers just to handle it safely. If there was a spill, we’d have to call a hazardous waste team—costing $1,500 a visit.”
Going green doesn’t mean replacing every machine—it means swapping harmful chemicals for safer options and optimizing steps to use less. Here are the changes that worked for us:
Laser etching uses a high-powered laser to remove copper from PI film—no sodium hydroxide or ferric chloride needed. It’s slower than chemical etching, but it’s cleaner and more precise.
We added one laser etching machine to our line. For small-batch FPCs (orders under 100 units), we use laser etching; for large batches, we still use chemical etching—but we reduced sodium hydroxide use by 40% by adjusting the laser’s role.
Chemical waste from etching dropped by 35%. “The laser doesn’t create any liquid waste,” Marco said. “And the traces are more precise—we’ve had fewer quality issues since switching.”
Start small—add one laser machine instead of replacing all chemical etching lines. It’s a lower upfront cost, and you can test if it works for your FPC designs.
Water-based cleaners (made with biodegradable surfactants) clean FPCs just as well as IPA—without the fumes or air pollution. They’re also cheaper and easier to dispose of (most can be treated with regular wastewater systems).
We switched to a water-based cleaner from a local supplier. We diluted it 1:10 with tap water, so a 20-liter jug lasts a week (vs. 300 liters of IPA).
IPA use dropped to zero. Workers no longer need respirators, and we saved $1,200 a month on IPA and filter replacements. “The cleaner even works better than IPA—it removes solder flux faster,” Elena said.
Test the water-based cleaner on a small batch first. Some cleaners work better for soldering residue, while others are better for lamination adhesive.
Instead of dumping cleaning water after one use, filter it and reuse it. This cuts down on both water and chemical use (since you add less new cleaner each time).
We added a simple filter system (a 5-micron filter and activated carbon) to our cleaning tank. We filter the water after each use and reuse it 3 times before replacing it.
Water use for cleaning dropped by 60%. “We used to change the cleaning water every day—now we change it every 3 days,” Marco said. “That’s 400 liters of water saved a week.”
Add a pH meter to the cleaning tank. When the pH level drops below 7 (too acidic), it’s time to replace the water—this ensures the cleaner stays effective.
Cyanide-free plating solutions (made with citric acid or sulfuric acid alternatives) are now widely available for FPC plating. They’re safer to handle and produce less toxic waste.
We switched to a cyanide-free gold plating solution. It’s slightly more expensive than the old cyanide version, but we saved money on training and waste disposal.
We no longer need a hazardous waste team for plating spills. “The new solution is so safe, any worker can handle it with basic gloves,” Elena said. “And the gold plating looks just as good—our clients haven’t noticed a difference.”
Ask your plating supplier for “RoHS-compliant” solutions. These are already tested to be less toxic and meet global environmental standards.
Solder paste contains flux (a chemical that cleans metal during soldering). Too much flux means more cleaning (and more chemicals). By using low-flux solder paste, you cut down on both flux and cleaning needs.
We switched to a low-flux solder paste. It has 30% less flux than our old paste, so FPCs need less cleaning after soldering.
Cleaning time dropped by 20%, and we used 25% less water-based cleaner. “The paste melts just as well as the old one,” Marco said. “We haven’t had any soldering defects.”
Use a stencil with smaller openings for solder paste. This controls how much paste is applied—less paste means less flux.
After 3 months of these changes, our line looked completely different. Here’s how we measured success:
Our client was even impressed: “We’re trying to be carbon-neutral by 2030,” their sustainability manager said. “Working with a supplier that cuts chemical use helps us hit our goals. We’ve increased our orders by 20% since you made the changes.”
We heard a lot of myths before going green—here’s what we learned was false:
Myth: Eco-friendly processes are slower.
Truth: Laser etching is slower for large batches, but low-flux solder paste and water-based cleaners speed up cleaning time. Our total production time stayed the same.
Myth: Green processes are more expensive.
Truth: We saved $8,000 a month on chemicals, waste disposal, and filters. The laser machine paid for itself in 6 months.
Myth: Green FPCs are lower quality.
Truth: Our defect rate dropped from 3% to 1%—laser etching is more precise, and low-flux paste reduces soldering issues.
Our $12,000 fine was a wake-up call. We thought chemical use was just a “cost of doing business”—but it turns out, cutting chemicals saves money, keeps workers safe, and helps the planet.
You don’t need to overhaul your entire line to go green. Start with one change: swap IPA for water-based cleaner, or try laser etching for small batches. Every liter of chemical you cut is a win—for your budget, your team, and the environment.
Next time you hold an FPC, think about how it was made. Was it etched with toxic sodium hydroxide, or with a clean laser? Was it cleaned with IPA fumes, or with water? The choice matters—and it’s getting easier to choose green.
Founded in 2009, our company has deep roots in the production of various circuit boards. We are dedicated to laying a solid electronic foundation and providing key support for the development of diverse industries.
Whether you are engaged in electronic manufacturing, smart device R&D, or any other field with circuit board needs, feel free to reach out to us via email at sales06@kbefpc.com. We look forward to addressing your inquiries, customizing solutions, and sincerely invite partners from all sectors to consult and collaborate, exploring new possibilities in the industry together.
English
Wechat
+86 13670210335
+86 13670210335
E-mail