News

FPC/PCB Anti-Interference Design Essentials in New Energy Vehicle (NEV) Electronics

Date: 2025-08-24

1. Introduction: Why Interference Is a "Safety Risk" for NEV Electronics

Imagine a Tesla Model 3’s battery management system (BMS) misreading cell voltage because of electromagnetic interference (EMI)—or a BYD’s charging port failing to communicate with a charger due to signal noise. In new energy vehicles, FPCs (Flexible PCBs) and PCBs power critical systems: BMS, motor controllers, ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems), and infotainment. Unlike traditional gas cars, NEVs have high-voltage batteries (400V-800V), powerful motors, and dozens of sensors—all of which generate massive EMI.

Interference isn’t just a "glitch"—it’s a safety hazard. A distorted signal in the BMS could lead to overcharging (risking battery fires), while noise in the ADAS could cause false collision warnings. For NEV engineers, designing FPCs/PCBs that resist EMI isn’t an option—it’s a requirement. Below are 5 critical anti-interference design points, with real examples from Tesla, Volkswagen, and Chinese NEV maker NIO.

2. Design Point 1: Separate "High-Voltage Noisy Zones" from "Low-Voltage Sensitive Zones"

NEVs have two conflicting electrical worlds:

  • High-Voltage Zones: Motor controllers, BMS, and chargers (400V-800V) generate strong EMI.
  • Low-Voltage Zones: ADAS sensors (e.g., LiDAR, cameras), GPS, and infotainment (12V-24V) are extremely sensitive to noise.

Mixing these zones on one FPC/PCB is a disaster—EMI from high-voltage circuits will corrupt low-voltage signals.

How to Implement:

  • Physical Separation: On PCBs, place high-voltage traces (e.g., BMS power lines) at least 10mm away from low-voltage traces (e.g., ADAS sensor wires). Tesla’s Model Y PCB for BMS uses a "zone divider": high-voltage circuits on the left, low-voltage on the right, with a 15mm gap.
  • FPC Routing: For FPCs in tight spaces (e.g., between the battery and motor), route high-voltage FPCs (e.g., motor power) and low-voltage FPCs (e.g., temperature sensors) in separate conduits. Volkswagen’s ID.4 uses plastic separators to keep FPCs from crossing—EMI-related sensor errors dropped by 65%.
  • Ground Planes as Barriers: Add a dedicated ground plane between high and low-voltage layers on multi-layer PCBs/FPCs. This acts as a "shield" to block EMI. NIO’s ES8 battery PCB uses a 0.2mm copper ground plane—high-voltage noise reaching low-voltage zones fell by 80%.

Real Example: A Chinese NEV startup once merged high-voltage BMS traces and low-voltage GPS traces on one PCB. The GPS signal was so noisy the car lost navigation 30% of the time. After separating the zones with a ground plane, GPS accuracy improved to 99%.

3. Design Point 2: Use Shielding to Block External EMI

NEV FPCs/PCBs are surrounded by noise sources: motors, inverters, and even nearby power lines. Without shielding, EMI will "leak" into circuits or "escape" to disrupt other systems.

How to Implement:

  • FPC Shielding: Wrap high-voltage FPCs (e.g., motor controller FPCs) in copper foil or conductive fabric. These materials absorb EMI—Tesla uses copper-foil-shielded FPCs for its Cybertruck’s motor connections; EMI leakage dropped by 75%.
  • PCB Shielding Cans: Add metal shielding cans (aluminum or steel) over sensitive PCB components (e.g., ADAS microchips). BYD’s Han EV uses shielding cans for its LiDAR PCB—external EMI interference fell by 90%.
  • Coaxial Cables for Critical Signals: For long FPC runs (e.g., from the dashboard to the rear camera), use coaxial FPCs (with a conductive outer layer). These work like TV cables—blocking EMI while carrying signals. Mercedes-Benz’s EQS uses coaxial FPCs for rear-view camera signals; no signal loss in high-EMI zones (e.g., near the motor).

Real Example: Volkswagen’s ID.3 had infotainment glitches (screen freezing) due to EMI from the motor. Adding aluminum shielding cans over the infotainment PCB’s main chip fixed the issue—glitches dropped from 12% to 1% of cars.
43.jpg

4. Design Point 3: Optimize Trace Routing to Reduce EMI Generation

Poor trace routing doesn’t just waste space—it creates "antennas" that generate or pick up EMI. For NEVs, where traces carry high currents (e.g., BMS power lines) or high-frequency signals (e.g., ADAS radar), routing is make-or-break.

How to Implement:

  • Short, Straight Traces: Long, curved traces act like antennas—keep high-voltage/high-frequency traces as short and straight as possible. Tesla’s BMS PCB traces are 30% shorter than industry average; EMI generation fell by 40%.
  • Avoid Parallel Traces for High/Low Voltage: Parallel traces (even separated by gaps) can "couple" EMI—high-voltage noise jumps to low-voltage lines. Instead, route traces at 90° angles to each other. NIO’s ES6 ADAS PCB uses 90° crossings; signal coupling dropped by 55%.
  • Match Trace Impedance: For high-frequency signals (e.g., radar, GPS), match trace impedance to the component (e.g., 50Ω for radar modules). Mismatched impedance causes signal reflections (a source of EMI). Ford’s Mustang Mach-E radar PCB uses impedance-matched traces; reflection-related EMI fell by 70%.

Real Example: A NEV charger PCB had overheating issues due to long, curved high-voltage traces. Redesigning the traces to be short and straight reduced EMI by 35%—and solved the overheating problem.

5. Design Point 4: Add Filtering Components to Suppress Noise

Even with separation and shielding, some EMI will sneak through. Filtering components (capacitors, inductors, ferrite beads) act like "gatekeepers"—blocking noise while letting valid signals pass.

How to Implement:

  • Decoupling Capacitors: Place small capacitors (e.g., 0.1μF) near ICs (microchips) on PCBs/FPCs. These absorb voltage spikes (a type of EMI) before they reach the chip. BYD’s BMS PCBs use decoupling capacitors for every IC; voltage noise dropped by 60%.
  • Ferrite Beads on Power Lines: Thread power traces (e.g., 12V infotainment power) through ferrite beads. These block high-frequency EMI (from motors) while letting DC power flow. Volkswagen’s ID.4 infotainment FPC uses ferrite beads—power-line EMI fell by 85%.
  • EMI Filters for High-Voltage Inputs: Install dedicated EMI filters (e.g., X-capacitors, Y-capacitors) on high-voltage inputs (e.g., charger inputs). These suppress noise from the grid before it enters the vehicle. Tesla’s Supercharger-compatible PCBs use EMI filters; grid-related noise dropped by 90%.

Real Example: NIO’s ES8 had BMS voltage reading errors due to noise from the charger. Adding X/Y-capacitor filters to the BMS’s high-voltage input fixed the issue—reading accuracy improved from 92% to 99.9%.

6. Design Point 5: Grounding—The "Foundation" of Anti-Interference

Bad grounding is the #1 hidden cause of EMI in NEV electronics. A messy ground (e.g., multiple components sharing a single ground trace) creates "ground loops"—currents flow between different ground points, generating noise.

How to Implement:

  • Single-Point Grounding for Low-Frequency Circuits: Connect all low-voltage components (e.g., sensors) to one common ground point. This eliminates ground loops. Ford’s Mach-E ADAS PCB uses single-point grounding; ground-loop noise fell by 75%.
  • Multi-Point Grounding for High-Frequency Circuits: For high-frequency signals (e.g., radar, 5G), connect components to the ground plane at multiple points. This reduces ground impedance (a source of EMI). Tesla’s Cybertruck radar PCB uses multi-point grounding; high-frequency noise dropped by 65%.
  • Separate Ground Planes for Different Systems: Use separate ground planes for high-voltage (BMS/motor) and low-voltage (ADAS/infotainment) systems—never mix them. BYD’s Han EV uses two ground planes; cross-system EMI fell by 80%.

Real Example: A Chinese NEV had false ADAS collision warnings due to ground loops in the sensor PCB. Redesigning the PCB to use single-point grounding for sensors eliminated the loops—false warnings dropped from 8% to 0.5%.

7. Conclusion: Anti-Interference = NEV Safety & Reliability

In new energy vehicles, FPC/PCB anti-interference design isn’t just about "fixing glitches"—it’s about protecting drivers, passengers, and the vehicle itself. Tesla’s 99.9% BMS accuracy, BYD’s reliable charging systems, and NIO’s stable ADAS all rely on these 5 design points: separating zones, shielding, optimized routing, filtering, and proper grounding.

The biggest mistake engineers make? Treating anti-interference as an "afterthought." A NEV startup once tried to add shielding to a faulty PCB after production—costing $2 million in rework. By designing for EMI from the start, you save time, money, and avoid safety risks.

Next time you drive an NEV and its battery charges smoothly, its ADAS warns you of a car in your blind spot, or its infotainment works without freezing—remember: the FPCs/PCBs inside are quietly fighting EMI to keep you safe. For NEV electronics, anti-interference design isn’t a feature—it’s a necessity.

Founded in 2009, our company has deep roots in the production of various circuit boards. We are dedicated to laying a solid electronic foundation and providing key support for the development of diverse industries.   Whether you are engaged in electronic manufacturing, smart device R&D, or any other field with circuit board needs, feel free to reach out to us via email at sales06@kbefpc.com. We look forward to addressing your inquiries, customizing solutions, and sincerely invite partners from all sectors to consult and collaborate, exploring new possibilities in the industry together.

Capel manufacturing PCBs since 2009. Professional technology and high-precision Printed Circuit Boards involved in Medical, IOT, UAV, Aviation, Automotive, Aerospace, Industrial Control, Artificial Intelligence, Consumer Electronics etc..

Facebook Twitter Linkedin YouTube Instagram

CONTACT US

    Shenzhen Capel Technology Co., Ltd. +86 13670210335 sales06@kbefpc.com +86 13670210335 +86 13670210335

Leave Your Message