Imagine a startup designing a smartwatch—they want to use rigid-flex boards for a slim design, but the cost is 3x higher than FPCs. Or a factory producing 100,000 FPCs for wireless earbuds, only to waste $50,000 on overengineered materials. For electronics makers, FPCs (Flexible PCBs) and rigid-flex boards are double-edged swords: they save space and boost functionality, but they’re often more expensive than traditional rigid PCBs.
The goal isn’t to "cut costs at all costs"—it’s to optimize 性价比 (cost-efficiency): getting the performance you need without overspending. Below, we break down 6 practical cost-control tips for FPCs and rigid-flex boards, using real examples from Xiaomi, Ford, and a Chinese consumer electronics factory. Each tip shows how to trim unnecessary expenses while keeping quality intact.
Overcomplicating FPC/rigid-flex designs is the #1 hidden cost. Engineers often add extra layers, narrow traces, or custom shapes that look good on paper but don’t improve performance—yet raise costs by 20-30%.
- Reduce Layer Count: For FPCs, use 2 layers instead of 4 if possible. A Chinese earbud factory switched from 4-layer to 2-layer FPCs (they only needed basic signal/power routes); cost per unit dropped by $0.80.
- Avoid Ultra-Narrow Traces: Narrower traces (e.g., 0.08mm vs. 0.1mm) require more precise manufacturing and increase failure rates. Xiaomi’s smartwatch team standardized trace widths at 0.1mm for FPCs; production yield rose by 15%, cutting rework costs.
- Skip Custom Shapes: Oddly shaped FPCs (e.g., star-shaped, curved with tiny notches) waste material and slow down cutting. Ford simplified the shape of its car sensor FPCs to basic rectangles with rounded edges; material waste fell by 25%.
Real Example: A fitness band startup initially designed a 4-layer rigid-flex board with custom curved edges. By switching to a 2-layer FPC with a simple shape, they cut per-unit cost by 40%—and the band still passed all durability tests.
Not every FPC/rigid-flex board needs top-of-the-line materials. Using high-end polyimide for a basic sensor FPC (that never bends) or ceramic-filled FR4 for a low-stress rigid-flex board is a waste of money.
- FPC Substrates: Use standard PI (polyimide) for low-bend applications (e.g., smartwatch straps) instead of glass-reinforced PI (GRPI). GRPI costs 30% more—save it for high-stress areas (e.g., foldable phone hinges). A Korean wearable factory did this; FPC material costs dropped by 22%.
- Rigid-Flex Adhesives: For consumer electronics (short lifespan, 2-3 years), use standard acrylic adhesives instead of high-temperature epoxy (which costs 50% more). Apple uses acrylic adhesives in AirPods’ rigid-flex boards; they last 3+ years with no issues.
- Coatings: Skip conformal coatings for FPCs in dry, low-dust environments (e.g., indoor smart thermostats). A home appliance maker removed the coating from its thermostat FPCs; cost per unit fell by $0.30, and failure rates stayed under 1%.
Real Example: Tesla once used expensive PTFE substrates for all its car FPCs. They later switched to standard PI for low-heat areas (e.g., door sensors) and reserved PTFE for engine sensors—saving $2 million annually.
FPCs and rigid-flex boards have high setup costs (e.g., laser cutting molds, tooling for layer bonding). Ordering small batches (e.g., 1,000 units) makes each board far more expensive than ordering 10,000+ units.
- Combine Small Orders: If you need FPCs for 2 different products (e.g., a smartwatch and a fitness band), order them in one batch. A consumer electronics brand did this; setup costs were split between the two products, cutting per-unit cost by 15%.
- Forecast Demand Accurately: Avoid emergency small batches by predicting 6-12 months of demand. Ford forecasts its car sensor FPC needs 12 months in advance; they order 50,000+ units at a time, getting a 20% bulk discount.
- Use "Common Designs": Design FPCs that work for multiple products (e.g., a single FPC size for 3 different smart bulb models). Philips did this for its smart lighting line; batch sizes doubled, and FPC costs dropped by 25%.
Real Example: A startup ordered 500 rigid-flex boards for its prototype—costing $15 each. When they scaled to 10,000 units, the price fell to $6 each—thanks to economies of scale.
Inefficient manufacturing (e.g., manual assembly, slow testing) increases labor costs and waste. Automating processes and reducing rework is key to saving money.
- Automate FPC Assembly: Replace manual soldering with automated pick-and-place machines. Manual assembly takes 2x longer and has a 10% error rate—automation cuts errors to 1% and labor costs by 40%. A Chinese FPC factory did this; production efficiency doubled.
- Simplify Testing: For low-risk FPCs (e.g., remote control buttons), use sampling tests (10% of the batch) instead of 100% electrical testing. A TV remote maker switched to sampling; testing time fell by 70%, and no major defects were missed.
- Reduce Rework: Fix design flaws before production (e.g., using design software to check for trace errors) instead of reworking faulty boards. A rigid-flex factory used design checks; rework rates dropped from 12% to 2%, saving $150,000 annually.
Real Example: Samsung’s foldable phone factory once had 15% rework on rigid-flex boards due to alignment errors. They added automated optical inspection (AOI) before bonding layers—rework fell to 3%, saving $1.5 million per month.
Many engineers stick with one supplier out of convenience, but shopping around and negotiating can lead to big savings. Suppliers often offer discounts for long-term contracts or volume commitments.
- Compare 3+ Suppliers: Get quotes from at least 3 manufacturers—prices can vary by 30%+. A medical device maker compared 5 suppliers; they found one that offered the same quality for 25% less.
- Negotiate Long-Term Contracts: Sign 1-2 year contracts with suppliers in exchange for lower prices. Medtronic has a 2-year contract with its rigid-flex supplier; they get a 18% discount and guaranteed delivery times.
- Ask for "Cost Breakdowns": Request a detailed breakdown of costs (materials, labor, setup) to find areas to cut. A drone maker did this; they noticed the supplier charged extra for "custom packaging"—they switched to standard packaging, saving $0.50 per board.
Real Example: Xiaomi negotiated a 3-year contract with its FPC supplier, committing to 1 million units annually. In return, they got a 22% discount—saving $3 million over 3 years.
Designing FPCs/rigid-flex boards to last 10 years when the product only has a 3-year lifespan is unnecessary. Over-engineering adds cost without value.
- Fold Cycles: For a foldable phone with a 3-year lifespan, design the FPC to survive 100,000 folds (enough for daily use) instead of 200,000. A Chinese phone brand did this; they used thinner PI layers, cutting FPC cost by 18%.
- Temperature Resistance: For consumer electronics (used at -10°C to 60°C), don’t design for -40°C to 125°C. A laptop maker adjusted its rigid-flex board’s temperature specs; they used cheaper FR4 for the rigid layers, saving $0.70 per unit.
- Vibration Tolerance: For indoor devices (no vibration), skip vibration-resistant designs. A smart speaker brand removed extra reinforcement from its rigid-flex boards; cost fell by $0.40, and durability wasn’t affected.
Real Example: A smart thermostat brand once designed its FPCs to last 10 years. They later realized most users replace thermostats every 5 years—they simplified the design, cutting cost by 25% with no impact on lifespan.
FPCs and rigid-flex boards don’t have to be expensive—you just need to avoid overcomplicating designs, overspending on materials, and wasting money on small batches. The best cost-control tips aren’t about "cheapening" products—they’re about matching every dollar spent to real performance needs.
Xiaomi saves millions by simplifying FPC designs and leveraging bulk orders; Tesla cuts costs by using the right materials for the right areas; Ford benefits from accurate demand forecasting. All of them prove that cost efficiency is achievable without hurting quality.
For engineers and buyers, the lesson is clear: take the time to review your FPC/rigid-flex design, material choices, and ordering habits. A small change—like switching to standard PI or combining batches—can add up to huge savings over time. At the end of the day, cost control is about working smarter, not harder.
Founded in 2009, our company has deep roots in the production of various circuit boards. We are dedicated to laying a solid electronic foundation and providing key support for the development of diverse industries.
Whether you are engaged in electronic manufacturing, smart device R&D, or any other field with circuit board needs, feel free to reach out to us via email at sales06@kbefpc.com. We look forward to addressing your inquiries, customizing solutions, and sincerely invite partners from all sectors to consult and collaborate, exploring new possibilities in the industry together.
English
Wechat
+86 13670210335
+86 13670210335
E-mail