Last year, my team was working on a battery management system (BMS) for an electric SUV. The BMS uses FPCs (Flexible Printed Circuits) to connect 12 battery sensors—critical for monitoring charge levels and preventing overheating. But during road tests, disaster struck: the sensors started sending wrong data. One minute, the battery showed 80% charge; the next, it dropped to 20%. “If this happens in a real drive, the car might shut down unexpectedly,” our lead engineer, Dr. Kai, said, staring at the glitchy data.
We traced the problem to electromagnetic interference (EMI) from the car’s motor and power cables. The FPCs, which ran near the motor, were picking up the noise like an antenna. “EVs are EMI nightmares,” Dr. Kai explained. “Motors, inverters, and fast-charging systems pump out high-frequency noise—regular FPCs can’t handle it.” Over the next three weeks, we redesigned the FPCs with anti-interference features, and the glitches vanished. The BMS now works perfectly, even during fast charging.
That experience taught us: FPCs in EVs need more than flexibility—they need to fight noise. Traditional consumer FPCs fail here, but EV-specific anti-interference design turns noisy chaos into reliable data.
EVs generate way more electromagnetic interference than gas-powered cars. Three systems are the biggest culprits—and they target FPCs directly:
EV motors run on 400V–800V power and switch current thousands of times per second. This creates high-frequency EMI (up to 100 MHz) that radiates outward. FPCs near the motor (like those in BMS sensors) pick up this noise, which corrupts sensor data.
“In our road tests, the FPCs were 10cm from the motor,” Dr. Kai said. “The EMI made the battery sensors think the cells were overheating when they weren’t. That’s a safety risk— the car might trigger an unnecessary shutdown.”
Fast chargers push 50kW–350kW of power into the battery, creating sudden EMI spikes. These spikes hit FPCs in the charging port or BMS, causing temporary glitches (like incorrect charge level readings).
“We tested fast charging with the original FPCs,” said our test technician, Lila. “Every time we plugged in the charger, the BMS froze for 2 seconds. That’s enough to confuse the driver about how much charge they’re getting.”
EV power cables carry high currents between the battery, motor, and inverter. These cables act like antennas, leaking EMI along their length. FPCs routed near these cables (e.g., in the dashboard or under the seats) pick up the leaked noise.
“We had FPCs for the climate control system running next to a power cable,” Dr. Kai said. “The EMI made the AC fan turn on and off randomly. Passengers complained about the temperature swinging up and down.”
Fixing EV FPC interference isn’t about “adding more shielding”—it’s about smart design that blocks, redirects, or cancels noise. Here are the tips that fixed our BMS FPCs:
A solid copper ground plane on the FPC acts like a shield, blocking EMI from reaching the signal traces. It also gives noise a path to ground (instead of corrupting data).
We added a 0.03mm-thick copper ground plane to the bottom of the BMS FPC. The plane covered 90% of the FPC’s area—only leaving space for connectors.
EMI pickup dropped by 70%. “The ground plane acted like a barrier,” Lila said. “The sensor data stopped glitching, even when we drove past power lines (another EMI source).”
Connect the ground plane to the car’s chassis ground (not just the FPC’s local ground). This pulls noise away from the FPC and into the car’s metal frame, where it dissipates.
If an FPC has two signal traces carrying opposite currents (e.g., a sensor’s “data in” and “data out”), twist them together. The EMI picked up by one trace cancels out the noise in the other—like two waves canceling each other.
We twisted the BMS sensor’s power and ground traces (which carry opposite currents) into a tight spiral (1 twist per cm). This canceled the EMI from the motor.
Sensor data accuracy jumped from 85% to 99.9%. “Before, the charge level was off by 10%,” Dr. Kai said. “Now it’s accurate to within 0.5%—even during fast charging.”
Twist traces as tightly as possible (1–2 twists per cm). Loose twists don’t cancel noise as effectively. Also, keep twisted pairs short (under 10cm) to avoid signal delay.
For FPCs near high-noise sources (like the motor or power cables), add a thin metal foil shield. This physically blocks EMI from reaching the traces.
We wrapped the BMS FPCs in aluminum foil (0.01mm thick) and grounded the foil to the car’s chassis. The foil acted like a “Faraday cage” around the FPC.
Fast-charging glitches disappeared. “We tested 50 fast-charge cycles with the shielded FPCs—no freezes, no wrong readings,” Lila said.
Use copper foil instead of aluminum for better conductivity (and better noise blocking). Also, overlap the foil edges by 5mm to avoid gaps—EMI sneaks through even tiny holes.
The simplest anti-interference trick: keep FPCs as far as possible from motors, power cables, and inverters. Even a 5cm gap can cut EMI pickup by 50%.
We rerouted the BMS FPCs from 10cm away from the motor to 20cm away. We also moved them to the opposite side of the battery pack (away from power cables).
Motor-related noise dropped by 60%. “Just moving the FPCs made a huge difference,” Dr. Kai said. “We didn’t need extra shielding for the parts that were now far from the motor.”
Create a “noise map” of the EV before routing FPCs. Mark where motors, cables, and inverters are—then route FPCs in the “quiet zones” (e.g., near the doors or trunk).
For FPCs that can’t be moved (e.g., dashboard FPCs near power cables), add small EMI filters (like ceramic capacitors or inductors) to the signal traces. These filters absorb high-frequency noise before it reaches the components.
We added 100nF ceramic capacitors to the climate control FPC’s power traces. The capacitors soaked up the noise from the nearby power cable.
Random AC fan behavior stopped. “The fan now turns on and off only when it’s supposed to,” Lila said. “Passengers no longer complain about temperature swings.”
Place filters as close to the FPC’s connectors as possible. This catches noise early, before it travels along the traces to the components.
After applying these tips, our BMS FPCs passed the strict EMI tests required for EV certification (like CISPR 25, the global standard for automotive EMI):
The EV manufacturer was thrilled: “We’ve had BMS FPCs fail EMI tests before,” their engineer said. “Yours passed on the first try—and the data is rock-solid, even in harsh conditions.”
Our BMS glitch disaster taught us that EV FPCs are a different beast from consumer FPCs. In EVs, noise isn’t a “minor issue”—it’s a safety risk. A glitching BMS could shut down a car on the highway; a noisy climate control FPC frustrates drivers.
The solution isn’t to over-engineer FPCs with heavy shielding—it’s to use smart, targeted design: ground planes to block noise, twisted pairs to cancel it, routing to avoid it, and filters to clean up what’s left. These tips don’t add much cost or thickness, but they turn unreliable FPCs into the backbone of a safe, smooth EV.
Next time you drive an EV, remember: the FPCs inside (powering the BMS, climate control, or infotainment) aren’t just flexible—they’re fighting noise every second. And that’s the difference between a car that works reliably and one that leaves you stranded.
Founded in 2009, our company has deep roots in the production of various circuit boards. We are dedicated to laying a solid electronic foundation and providing key support for the development of diverse industries.
Whether you are engaged in electronic manufacturing, smart device R&D, or any other field with circuit board needs, feel free to reach out to us via email at sales06@kbefpc.com. We look forward to addressing your inquiries, customizing solutions, and sincerely invite partners from all sectors to consult and collaborate, exploring new possibilities in the industry together.
English
Wechat
+86 13670210335
+86 13670210335
E-mail